Monday, November 05, 2007

Nature of 1915 events not clarified yet, Turkish PM says

05.11.2007
PanARMENIAN.Net
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan obviously has his own agenda and does not want to acknowledge the response he received from President Robert Kocharian of Armenia, see here.
“The crisis between Turkey and the United States has burst out after passage of the Armenian Genocide resolution by the U.S. congressional panel. This document jeopardizes relations with our ally and is counterproductive as regards the Turkish-Armenian reconciliation,” Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said.

The nature of 1915 events has not clarified yet, according to him. “Armenians claim that the law on displacement was targeted at extermination of all Armenians. On the other hand, numerous Turkish, American and European scientists say it was not genocide. Execution of the law was a security measure. We understand that the two states have a different perception of those events. This issue is very delicate for both Armenians and Turks. That is why Turkey insists that the assessment of the events should be given by historians but not parliaments,” the Turkish FM told Italian La Republica.

“I suggested the Armenian President that Armenian, Turkish and even foreign scholars study archives. However, Armenia has not responded yet. The measure of the U.S. committee was not a successful one. We are hopeful that reason will dominate and the bill will not be brought to the House floor,” Erdogan said.

! Reproduction in full or in part is prohibited without reference to «PanARMENIAN.Net».

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Genocide Recognition More for Benefit of Turkey than Armenia

Embassy, May 9th, 2007
LETTERS

The Turkish Embassy once again champions the Turkish proposal of establishing a "joint commission of historians" to investigate the issue of Armenian Genocide of 1915 (Re: "Turkish Offer of Joint Commission with Armenians Still on the Table." Letters, May 2). It is not clear from the letter how such a commission can be put together and produce results when Turkey refuses to establish diplomatic relations with Armenia, imposes illegal unilateral coercive economic measures against land-locked Armenia in a form of a blockade, deliberately destroys and distorts Armenian cultural heritage in Eastern Anatolia, and spends millions of dollars annually in a futile attempt to convince the world that it was Armenians who committed genocide against Turks.

How can we take the Turkish proposal seriously when impartial Turkish historians who dare voice opinions different from the state-imposed genocide denial are labeled traitors and have no other choice but to leave their own country? Will Turkey be ready to recall all those exiled historians and include them in the proposed commission, or will we have to deal with staunch genocide deniers only?

The Turkish notion of "equal suffering" of Armenians and Turks during the First World War is absolutely immoral. In a matter of weeks a whole nation disappeared without any trace from its historical homeland.

Nobody denies that thousands of Turks died during that war. But during the Second World War more than 10 million Germans died, too. Does that justify the Holocaust?

Turkey needs the recognition of the Armenian genocide more than Armenia. It needs it in order to come to terms with the most shameful page of its history, and to prove itself worthy of entering the European family of nations.

Armenia and Turkey are neighbours, and they eventually will have to normalize their relations. For the 16th year in a row, Armenia proposes to establish formal relations and to open the Armenian-Turkish border, the last surviving segment of the Iron Curtain. The time to stop this unfortunate counting of years is long overdue.

ARMAN AKOPIAN
Chargé d'Affaires
Embassy of Armenia


Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Turkey Insists On Joint Study Of ‘Armenian Tragedy’

Wednesday 28, March 2007
ArmeniaLiberty
By Emil Danielyan

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul reiterated on Wednesday his government’s calls for the creation of a commission of Turkish and Armenian historians who would jointly examine the mass killings and deportations of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire.

The move appeared to be part of Turkey’s ongoing efforts to scuttle the passage of a U.S. congressional resolution recognizing the 1915-1918 slaughter of more than one million Ottoman Armenians as genocide.

Writing in “The Washington Times,” Gul warned that the resolution’s approval by the U.S. Congress would jeopardize Turkish-American “strategic partnership” and would be “deeply offensive to the Turkish people.” Still, he stopped short of explicitly denying that the Armenian massacres constituted a genocide, describing them as a “tragedy” that requires deeper academic research.

“With regard to the Armenian allegation describing the tragedy that befell them as genocide, the question, from the point of view of international law, is whether the Ottoman government systematically pursued a calculated act of state policy for their destruction in whole or in part,” Gul wrote. “The answer to this question can only be established by scholars who have the ability to evaluate the period objectively, working with the full range of available primary sources.”

“Hence, Turkey made a proposal to Armenia in 2005 to establish a joint commission of historians to find out once and for all what really happened, and how it took place,” he said, adding that Ankara is still “eagerly awaiting” Yerevan’s positive response to the offer.

In his written response to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President Robert Kocharian effectively rejected the idea and suggested that this and other contentious issues be tackled by a Turkish-Armenian intergovernmental commission. Armenia’s government and Diaspora argue that the Armenian genocide is a fact recognized by many international historians. They regard the Turkish offer as a ploy design to stop a growing number of countries from affirming the genocide.

The offer appears to have marked a major change in the Turkish state’s position on the highly sensitive subject. Successive Turkish governments have for decades asserted that Ottoman Armenians died in smaller numbers and were not victims of a premeditated genocidal policy. They have also claimed that Armenians themselves massacred hundreds of thousands of Ottoman Turks.

Gul and other Turkish officials now say they are ready to accept any conclusion to be drawn by the would-be commission of historians. In his article, Gul said the Erdogan government would also welcome involvement of scholars from the United States and other countries in the proposed research. “The establishment of such a commission will also help shape an atmosphere conducive to the normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations,” he added.

A group of prominent Armenians and Turks already initiated a third-party study of the events of 1915-1918 when they jointly approached the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) in 2002. In a detailed report, the New York-based organization concluded that the Armenian massacres “include all of the elements of the crime of genocide” as defined by a 1948 United Nations convention.

U.S. President George W. Bush has repeatedly cited the ICTJ study in his annual April 24 messages to the Armenian-American community. The most recent of Bush’s statements called it “a significant contribution toward deepening our understanding of these events.”

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Friday, March 16, 2007

Turkish, Armenian historians quarrel over failed study initiative

16.03.2007
Today’s Zaman İstanbul

Turkish and Armenian historians remained at odds following the failure last week of a planned joint study into the World War I events in eastern Anatolia, which Armenians claim amounted to genocide.

Yusuf Halaçoğlu, who heads the Turkish Historical Society (TTK), rejected accusations from British Armenian historian Ara Sarafian that their plans for a joint case study on the treatment of Armenians in Harput in eastern Anatolia in 1915 would not work because Halaçoğlu said he could not provide some of the documents he requested.

"I never said that we could not open some of the archives or that we cannot show some documents," Halaçoğlu said in a statement released Wednesday afternoon. He noted that he did not have the legal authority to impose restrictions on archive documents. Halaçoğlu, speaking last week, blamed the Armenian diaspora for failure of the initiative and said Sarafian bowed to pressure from the diaspora.

"I particularly want to stress that Mr. Sarafian has probably been subject to pressure," Halaçoğlu then said. "As a matter of fact, a news report published by [bilingual Armenian-Turkish newspaper] Agos said that the Armenian diaspora was very angry with Sarafian because of his proposal to study with Turkish historians."

In London, Sarafian refuted claims that he was afraid to carry out research with a Turkish academic and said Halaçoğlu had told him some of the documents he requested were not available in the Ottoman archives.

"This is an incredible statement. I expect Halaçoğlu to clarify what this means," he said in an interview with the Cihan News Agency. "I am not the one who gave up on the research. I am the one who proposed doing research in Turkey and would love to work in this direction."

He said, however, that his proposal was no longer on the table because the documents, as Halaçoğlu said, were not in the Ottoman archives. "If these documents are not available, then we of course cannot do any study," he was quoted as saying by Cihan.

Sarafian also said he wanted to stay in contact with Turkey and that he favored dialogue. "I favor dialogue to show that at least those days when Turks and Armenians were killing each other are over," he said. "I believe there will be a consensus on that but I know that this will not be easy." He also said: "I am not a supporter of the Armenian diaspora who criticizes Turkey without talking to Turkish historians and looking into the archives. I am in favor of trying to work in and with Turkey as much as I can."

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Why do we invite them in the first place?

Wednesday, March 14, 2007
TDN
By Mehmet Ali Birand

I read it in Fatih Altaylı's column in Sabah daily yesterday.

Turkish History Institute (TTK) President Yusuf Halaçoğlu was supposed meet with Ara Sarafyan, the author of Blue Book, which is seen as one of the most important documents backing Armenian claims.

Both sides were supposed to produce various documents to argue their case, the first such meeting.

I was very excited about it.

Armenians usually don't participate in such meetings. “The whole world accepts the genocide. Why should we open a case over something already accepted,” they usually asked. Sarafyan was very important in this respect. His visit was supposed to provide a huge boost to Turkey's call for historians focusing on the matter, discussing and debating it.

Suddenly, we were all told the meeting was cancelled. Professor Halaçoğlu held a press conference and said Sarafyan had cancelled the trip, presenting an article in weekly AGOS that said the Armenian diaspora was furious about Sarafyan's trip. That was the reason of cancellation, he said.

Now we learn from Altaylı that the real reason why the meeting was cancelled was very different. It appears Halaçoğlu refused to open the archives without limits and objected to presenting certain documents.

What was this all about?

If you were not going to show the documents, why would you ask for a meeting? Why do you organize such a meeting before agreeing on the conditions of opening of the archives? Why do you initiate a process you cannot go take to the finish?

Turkey is already on the defensive on this issue and this latest development means another point scored against us. No one will ever believe Turkey when it proposes to open the archives and share all the documents so that historians can discuss the matter.

[...]

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels: ,

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Spite meeting to be held

Saturday, 24 February
Sabah
What reasons has Turkey given to earn the trust of the Armenians in the Diaspora let alone in Armenia and Turkey?
Diaspora responded to the suggestion of the Armenian historian Sarafyan with a threat. Halaçoğlu stated that he will invite Sarafyan to Turkey.

The extreme nationalist Armenians reacted harshly to the suggestion of Sarafyan to conduct a collaborative research in Harput. Sarafyan stated that he received criticisms such as "you are not a real Armenian, Turks will foul you, you are making a mistake." Sarafyan stated that he will not quit in spite of the criticisms.

Armenian historian comes in spite of Diaspora

The director of Gomidas institute, Ara Sarafyan said that he will meet with Professor Halaçoğlu although the extreme nationalist Armenians said: "you are not a real Armenian, Turks will foul you".

The extreme nationalist Armenians reacted harshly to the suggestion of Sarafyan to conduct a collaborative research with the chairman of the Turkish Historical Society, Professor Yusuf Halaçoğlu in Harput about the events regarding Armenians. Sarafyan stated that he received criticisms such as "you are not a real Armenian, Turks will foul you, and you are making a mistake." Sarafyan stated that he will not quit in spite of the criticisms.

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Saturday, April 30, 2005

Armenia: Our Archives are Open

30.04.2005
Today's Zaman
Anadolu News Agency (aa), Cihan News Agency Yerevan, Kayseri

After Turkey's announced the opening of its archives regarding the so-called Armenian genocide allegations and inviting historians to conduct research, Armenia, too announced that its archives are open.

The Armenian Foreign Ministry said that their archives are open to any countries or researchers who wish to conduct studies on genocide claims. Spokesperson for the Ministry, Hamlek Gasparyan, noted that many scientists have already done studies on the Armenian archives. "However, there were no Turks among them. If Turkish scientists want, they can come and study." he said. Gasparyan claimed that any propaganda should be left aside and researchers should be clear in this issue. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who sent an official letter to Yerevan proposing the formation of a "joint research commission" to investigate the allegations, had suggested to Yerevan on last Wednesday: "Let's open our archives, let them be examined and let's accept the outcome."

Meanwhile, Armenian President Robert Kocharian announced that an international "Presidential Award" would be given to those who contribute to the recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide allegations, in 2006. Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, on the other side, made an announcement in Kayseri yesterday and said that there are no current plans to open the Armenian border at this stage.


Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Thursday, April 14, 2005

Armenia: Yerevan Appears Unmoved At Turkey’s Genocide-Study Offer

By Jean-Christophe Peuch

Yerevan showed little response today after Ankara’s proposal to conduct a joint investigation into the mass killings and deportations of Armenians during World War I. Turkish leaders yesterday suggested that both countries set up a joint commission of historians to determine whether the massacres carried out between 1915 and 1917 constituted genocide. Armenia insists it will continue to seek international recognition and condemnation of what it says was a deliberate attempt at exterminating an entire people. RFE/RL correspondent Jean-Christophe Peuch reports.

Prague, 14 April 2005 (RFE/RL) -- Armenia today reacted coolly to Turkey’s initiative.

In comments made to RFE/RL’s Armenian Service, presidential spokesman Viktor Soghomonian said Yerevan had still not been officially notified of the Turkish proposal.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamlet Gasparian, in turn, said Armenia would not agree to any initiative that aims at questioning the genocide issue. “I cannot say what Armenian authorities will decide and how they will react when they get this [proposal], but let me remind you that there have been such calls before to set up a commission of historians to determine whether there was genocide," he said. "Armenia has once and for all said that the genocide issue is not a subject for debate.”

Addressing the Turkish Grand National Assembly on yesterday in Ankara, Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul called upon Armenia to accept the creation of a joint commission of historians. He added that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan had already sent a letter to that effect to Armenian President Robert Kocharian.

Gul said a positive Armenian response would contribute to improving relations between Ankara and Yerevan. The two countries severed diplomatic ties 12 years ago in the midst of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war over Nagorno-Karabakh.

Talking to reporters in Yerevan shortly before Gul’s speech, Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian said, however, that his government will continue to seek recognition -- including from Turkey itself -- of the massacres as genocide.

“With regard to the protection of human rights, we have the moral right and the moral obligation to be on the front line today," Oskanian said. "The world expects us to take adequate steps in that direction. We must be on the front line, seek recognition of the genocide and, because we are a people that already went through this, discuss ways to prevent [other] genocides.”

Gul had made it clear last week that Turkey should prepare what he had described as a “counter-strategy” as Armenians worldwide prepare to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the 1915-17 tragedy on 24 April.

So far, only a few governments and national parliaments have recognized Armenia’s genocide claims. Those include France, Russia, Lebanon, Uruguay, Switzerland, Greece, and Canada. The European Parliament and a number of U.S. states have also recognized the slaughtering of Ottoman Armenians as stemming from a systematic policy of extermination.

Turkey is very much concerned the U.S. Congress may follow soon. Ankara has recently enlisted the support of an American historian, Justin McCarthy, to reject the Armenian genocide claims.

Addressing Turkish lawmakers last month, McCarthy reportedly argued that the mass killings of Armenians were the result of war operations, not of a deliberate, government-sponsored policy. Reuters at the time quoted the U.S. expert as accusing world politicians of using the genocide claims to hinder Turkey’s bid for European Union membership.

Most Western historians estimate that at least 1 million Armenians were slaughtered during the final years of the Ottoman Empire.

Gul yesterday accused Yerevan and the Armenian diaspora of working relentlessly to undermine Turkey’s image:

“[We are] confronted with a very well-organized campaign, which makes use of every opportunity to discredit Turkey," Gul said. "This organized campaign against our country is based on bias, prejudice, slander, exaggerations, and distortions that were fabricated nearly one century ago.”

Most Western historians estimate that at least 1 million Armenians were slaughtered during the final years of the Ottoman Empire. They argue the massacres -- which followed the slaughter of at least 200,000 Greeks -- were part of a deliberate policy by the ruling Committee of Union and Progress to exterminate the empire’s largest remaining Christian community.

The Unionists, also known as the Young Turks, ruled over the Ottoman Empire from 1912 through the end of World War I.

A few of those CUP leaders believed to have ordered and supervised the 1915-17 massacres were later executed by Armenian commandos.

Although some Unionist officials were tried by Ottoman courts after the war for their participation in the slaughter, the genocide issue remains taboo in today’s Turkey.

All the successive nationalist governments that have taken over from Ottoman rulers have persistently refused to recognize the genocide claims.

If Turkish leaders admit to the killing of tens of thousands of Armenians, they maintain the deaths were the result of either war operations or interethnic strife, not of a genocidal policy. They also say as many Muslims -- mainly Turks and Kurds -- were killed during those years.

Addressing lawmakers of the ruling Justice and Development party, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan yesterday said his country was not afraid of confronting its past:

“Medicine has yet to invent a remedy for those who do not want to open their eyes to history,” Erdogan said.

Yet, all those who, in Turkey, challenge the official version of the 1915-17 events face potential troubles.

Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk recently caused uproar for saying in a February interview with Switzerland’s “Tagesanzeiger” magazine that 1 million Ottoman Armenians had been slaughtered during World War I.

Although Pamuk did not refer to the massacres as “genocide,” some Turkish newspapers accused him of “treason.” Also last month, a high-ranking government official in Turkey’s Isparta Province ordered copies of Pamuk’s books to be seized and destroyed.

In his address to parliament yesterday, Gul said Turkey will formally ask British lawmakers to reject as “baseless” a collection of eyewitness accounts of the massacres. The accounts sustain the view that Ottoman Armenians were slaughtered systematically.

Known as the “Blue Book,” those accounts were collected by historian Arnold Toynbee and published by the British parliament in 1916. They have served as a major source on the Armenian massacres.

(RFE/RL Armenian Service correspondents Anna Saghabalian and Nane Adjemian contributed to this report from Yerevan.)


Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Thursday, March 17, 2005

In Turkey, taboo lifts over past treatment of Armenians

Thu Mar 17, 2005
The Christian Science Monitor

Last week, Prime Minister Erdogan proposed a joint study into Armenian claims of genocide.

By Yigal Schleifer, Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

ISTANBUL, TURKEY - When Turkish executive Noyan Soyak helped found a group to bring together businessmen from Turkey and Armenia, the organization stepped into a gaping void.

"When we started [in 1997], it was difficult even to publicly pronounce the word 'Armenia' or 'Armenians' in Turkey," says Mr. Soyak, whose group today has some 250 Turkish and Armenian members.

The Armenian issue has long been one of the most fraught in Turkey, the limits of its discussion strictly controlled by the state. Driven apart by nearly a century of hatred and accusations of genocide, the two neighbors became further estranged after diplomatic relations were broken off by Ankara in 1993, in the wake of Armenia's occupation of a large chunk of territory belonging to Turkish ally Azerbaijan.

But Soyak and others say something has changed - that Turkey's increasing democratization and reforms related to its European Union (news - web sites) membership bid have slowly started to soften the country's historical stance.

Despite the lack of official relations, a growing number of nongovernmental Turkish groups - from academics and businessmen to musicians and women's organizations - are now meeting with their Armenian counterparts, in the process helping to redefine the debate in Turkey and ease the enmity between the two nations.

"Any and all kinds of relationships are important for softening up the infrastructure for the politicians," Soyak says. "Governments can't move as quickly as we do, so civil society groups are leading the way."

Hrant Dink, the editor of Agos, a newspaper serving Turkey's Armenian community, says the evolution of what is allowed to be said can be seen in the pages of his publication. When Agos was launched 10 years ago, Mr. Dink took an indirect approach to writing about the past. "Previously, when we talked about history, we didn't mention things that happened but focused on culture instead," says Dink, speaking in the newspaper's Istanbul office.

"Slowly we started to ask what happened to the Armenians," he says. "Now we're at the point of telling what happened."

Even if the subject is "no longer taboo" as Dink says, the debate still fundamentally divides Turkey and Armenia. Armenians say the Ottomans killed 1.5 million of their people from 1915 to 1923 through deportations and mass killings in what is now eastern Turkey. Armenians have been waging an international campaign to have this recognized as genocide; more than a dozen nations do so today. Turkey rejects the genocide claim. It admits that Armenians were killed but disputes the number and says that the deaths were unorganized and part of wider regional violence that also affected Muslim Turks.

Until recently, the Turkish state's official version of events was all that could be aired publicly. But observers say that democratic reforms - many of them the result of pressure by the EU - have created more space for public debate on the topic.

"The level of education has gone up and civil society has expanded, so the state can no longer dominate and monopolize the public sphere," says Muge Gocek, a Turkish sociologist who is the co-organizer of the Workshop for Armenian-Turkish Studies, an annual gathering of Turkish and Armenian scholars.

In an unusual turn, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan called last week for a study by Turkish and Armenian historians of claims of genocide at the hands of Ottoman Turkish troops. The Armenian Foreign Ministry has rejected Mr. Erdogan's proposal.

Indeed, those involved in Turkish-Armenian reconciliation efforts caution that the road towards normalizing relations is still very bumpy. Turkish officials say they believe Armenian genocide claims will lead to demands for reparations and territory.

Ustun Erguder, a Turkish political scientist and member of the Turkish Armenian Reconciliation Commission, a group of academics and former diplomats from both sides, says the association of the word "genocide" with the barbarity of Nazi Germany makes the claim hard for Turks. "I think Turks have come a long way even to say, 'We did something wrong to the Armenians.' "

The issue remains explosive. When Orhan Pamuk, a famous Turkish author, stated in a Swiss paper last month that "a million Armenians were killed in Turkey," the response included death threats and charges of dishonoring the state filed against him in court.

Van Krikorian, a former chairman of the Armenian Assembly of America, says the only way forward is more dialogue. "On the Turkish side and the Armenian side, people need to feel they can discuss what happened and not feel as though somebody is going to attack them," he says.

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Monday, March 14, 2005

Turkey ready to face past

ANKARA – Turkish Daily News 14/03/2005 19:49

Ankara is now well placed to tell the West to encourage scholarly investigation into genocide allegations instead of just listening to the Armenians and passing resolutions recognizing what they say as fact.

A three-step strategy of initiating a joint investigation of Turkish and Armenian historians; opening of national archives to scholars, not only in Turkey and Armenia but also in other countries concerned; and the establishment by an international organization, such as UNESCO, of a notary mechanism to make sure the investigation will be conducted in a strictly scientific manner. A former diplomat who worked extensively on the Armenian issue, Elekdað {of the Republican People's Party (CHP) the main opposition} is the architect of the strategy that was adopted on Tuesday by both the ruling and opposition parties.

The issue is becoming more important in connection with Turkey's bid to join the European Union. Some conservative politicians in EU countries have already argued that Turkey's recognition of the alleged genocide must be a condition for further progress in its bid to join the EU. Observers warn a much bigger wave of pressure to recognize the alleged genocide may descend upon Turkey in the months to come as Armenians across the world are preparing for large-scale commemoration activities to mark the 90th anniversary of the alleged genocide.

Getting ‘Blue Book' right:

The Turkish initiative also includes attempts to invalidate charges made in a World War I-era book written by British diplomat James Bryce and historian Arnold Toynbee called “The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, 1915–1916,” or the “Blue Book,” as it is more commonly known.

Turkish parliamentarians are now planning to send a letter to the British House of Lords and House of Commons, asking the British Parliament to declare the book a “propaganda tool” and thus deny its arguments that Ottoman Turks had perpetrated a grave crime against humanity on Armenians in the era concerned.

Elekdað called the book a “masterpiece of British wartime propaganda” designed to win over the wavering pro-Entente neutrals, in particular the United States.

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Saturday, March 12, 2005

ARMENIA REJECTS TURKISH PROPOSAL THAT HISTORIANS SHOULD ADDRESS GENOCIDE

March 12, 2005
Hellenic Resources Network

Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian told Reuters on 10 March that there is no point in Armenian and Turkish historians conducting a joint study of the alleged 1915 genocide. Oskanian said historians "have already said their piece," and that it is up to Turkey to "determine its attitude." Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan called on 8 March for "an impartial study" of the killings, Reuters reported. Erdogan said that Ankara has opened its archives to scholars studying the alleged genocide and Armenia should do the same. The director of Armenia's National Archive, Amatuni Virabian, told RFE/RL's Armenian Service on 17 February that those archives are open "without restriction" to any Turkish scholars who are interested. Virabian said the archives contain up to 12,000 documents, primarily first-hand accounts of the incidents from survivors. LF

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Thursday, March 10, 2005

Armenia Refuses Offer for Joint Study by Historians

Thursday, March 10 2005
Turks.US Daily News

Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanyan has refused an offer for a joint study by Turkish and Armenian historians on the so-called Armenian genocide allegations. Oskanyan turned down Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's offer, on the grounds that the joint study had no base.

Oskanyan said they have made clear their stance on the issue. Saying that they had already stated the findings of their historians, Oskanyan added: "Turkey should put forward their case. There is nothing left for historians to do." Meanwhile, Turkey has decided to continue its relations with Armenia via its embassy in Tbilisi rather than Moscow. Turkish Foreign Ministry Spokesman Namik Tan said: "We have reached the conclusion that the Tbilisi embassy is more effective than the Moscow Embassy in many respects. In the light of this evaluation, our transactions with Armenia will be executed by the Turkish embassy in Tbilisi from now on." Armenia, meanwhile, carries out its transactions related with Turkey via its Moscow embassy. Tan also determined that the foreign ministry was always alert to the genocide claims.

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Wednesday, March 09, 2005

Turk PM Urges Probe of Armenia Genocide Claims

Wed Mar 9, 2005 1:07 AM ET



ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan called Tuesday for an impartial study by historians of Armenian claims that their people suffered genocide at the hands of Ottoman Turkish troops during and after World War One.

"We have opened our archives to those people who claim there was genocide. If they are sincere they should also open their archives," Erdogan told a news conference

Turkey denies any genocide, saying the Armenians were victims of a partisan war which also claimed many Muslim Turkish lives. Turkey accuses Armenians of carrying out massacres while siding with invading Russian troops.

In an unusual gesture that underlined the sensitivity of the issue in Turkey, opposition leader Deniz Baykal joined Erdogan at the news conference to stress his party's full backing for an independent inquiry into the claims.


"We are facing a political campaign (against Turkey)," said Baykal, leader of the Republican People's Party (CHP).

Several foreign parliaments, including those of Canada, France and Switzerland, have approved resolutions recognizing an Armenian genocide as fact, much to Turkey's irritation.


Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Monday, February 28, 2005

Armenian historians will not attend VAT Meeting in May

February 28, 2005
Hellenic Resources

Ankara Anatolia (28.02.05) reported from Vienna that Armenian historians will not attend the meeting to be held in Austrian capital of Vienna in May in which they will exchange documents with Turkish historians regarding the so-called Armenian genocide, the Vienna Armenian-Turkish Platform (VAT) said on Monday.

VAT, acting as a mediator between Turkish and Armenian historians who are willing to exchange documents, stated that Prof. Dr. Lavrenti Barseghian, the director of Yerevan genocide museum, and Prof. Dr. Ashot Melkonian, the director of the History Department of the Armenian Sciences Academy, notified them in writing that they would not attend the second meeting planned to be held in May.

Pointing out that the main target of the Armenian diaspora in 2005 is to make several countries ''accept the 1915 incidents as genocide'', VAT-member historians stress that Turkey has proved that it is ready for dialogue and will take action for a possible solution.

VAT historians added: ''As VAT, we expect the international community, particularly Armenia and Turkey, to deal with this matter more seriously and systematically. And, we believe that both parties will establish dialogue with each other under equal circumstances, and take VAT concept as a model.''

The VAT, comprised of historians working at the Vienna University namely Prof. Dr. Wolfdieter Bihl, Dr. Kerstin Tomenendal, Dr. Inanc Atilgan and Dr. Artem Ohandjanian, had been a platform for exchange of documents between Turkish and Armenian historians in July of 2004.

Prof. Dr. Yusuf Halacoglu, the head of the Turkish History Authority (TTK), and Prof. Dr. Hikmet Ozdemir, the head of the Armenian Desk of TTK, joined the first meeting held in Vienna in July 2004 and delivered 100 documents regarding the 1915 incidents to VAT officials.

On the other hand, Armenian historians did not participate in July's meeting and sent 100 documents to the meeting via VAT member historian Dr. Artem Ohandjanian of Armenian origin.

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels:

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Armenian 'genocide': Probe sought

Wednesday 12 January 2005
Aljazeera

"I think we historians, Turkish, American, French, British and Armenian, must come together and form a commission to investigate this issue objectively," Yusuf Halacoglu, head of the Turkish Historical Society, said on Wednesday.

Halacoglu said the commission would ideally work under the auspices of the United Nations or another international body to help ensure impartiality and to encourage all states concerned to open up their archives to the panel.

He was due to discuss his research on the period on Wednesday with Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul and said he hoped for official Turkish backing for a commission.

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.

Labels: