Pols sidestep debate over Armenian genocide

April 24, 2007
The Politico
By: Ryan Grim

This article says "The Turkish government is backing up its talk with serious lobbying power. The Livingston Group -- the powerful firm of former Louisiana Republican congressman Bob Livingston -- represents Turkey and is fighting the resolution. According to the watchdog group Public Citizen, Turkey paid the Livingston Group $9 million between 2000 and 2004, and Turkey recently hired DLA Piper, the firm of former House minority leader Dick Gephardt, to provide access to Democrats."

Is it OK for an outside country to influence a sovereign country by paying lobbyists? May be for USA it is since Americans are keeping silent. What then makes USA a powerful country?

By regional standards, the Armenian genocide happened yesterday. Or, if you're the government of Turkey or the United States, there was no genocide.

Now Congress is weighing in, and the diplomatic foray has gotten messy.

The Bush administration, like others before it, refuses to use the word "genocide." Beginning in 1915, more than 1.5 million Armenians died when the Ottoman government forced the relocation of the population. President Bush has a reason not to call it genocide: That would anger the Turkish government, an ally and a Muslim democracy which has threatened to revoke permission for the U.S. to use an important air base over the issue, among other repercussions.

Resolutions recognizing and condemning the genocide have been introduced in both the House and the Senate, and the administration is vigorously opposing them. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a joint letter that the resolution could "harm American troops in the field."

And Turkey's lobbying prowess has already forced four co-sponsors to back off the bill.

Nonetheless, backers of the nonbinding resolutions in Congress feel this could be the year it happens and have gained momentum from a Los Angeles Times editorial last weekend in support of the measure, which now has 190 co-sponsors in the House and 29 in the Senate version sponsored by Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.).

The International Association of Genocide Scholars, among numerous other reputable historical groups, has described the event as genocide, explaining in a 2005 letter to the Turkish government that, beginning in April 1915, "…under cover of World War I, the Young Turk government of the Ottoman Empire began a systematic genocide of its Armenian citizens -- an unarmed Christian minority population. More than a million Armenians were exterminated through direct killing, starvation, torture and forced death marches…"

The Turkish government, which replaced the Ottomans, disputes the account and is fighting to prevent debate on the resolution. A Turkish Embassy spokesman said that the Armenian deaths -- they place the toll at 200,000 -- occurred during an armed revolt by Armenian rebels who opposed being relocated by the Ottoman government.

"We don't believe the term 'genocide' has anything to do with what happened in 1915 in the Ottoman Empire. It's a very incriminating and serious claim," the spokesman said.

Turkey has long threatened repercussions in trade and diplomatic relations if the U.S. recognizes the genocide. "It's going to affect our cooperation," the embassy spokesman said. "We don't see what the advantages are for the United States in passing this. Only the enemies of the United States and Turkey would be happy."

The Turkish government is backing up its talk with serious lobbying power. The Livingston Group -- the powerful firm of former Louisiana Republican congressman Bob Livingston -- represents Turkey and is fighting the resolution. According to the watchdog group Public Citizen, Turkey paid the Livingston Group $9 million between 2000 and 2004, and Turkey recently hired DLA Piper, the firm of former House minority leader Dick Gephardt, to provide access to Democrats.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill feel the pressure. So far, four House members who initially co-sponsored the resolution, including Rep. David Scott (D-Ga.), have withdrawn their support.

"I initially did it as a favor to Schiff," Scott said, referring to one of the bill's lead sponsors, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). "If I had known it would be this kind of a mess, I'd never have gotten into it. I wasn't there. I don't know what happened. Out of fairness, let them settle it."

Scott said he withdrew as a co-sponsor after meeting with a number of his Turkish-American constituents. (His district includes a sizable Turkish-American population.)

Rep. Dennis Moore (D-Kan.) also supported the resolution before he withdrew as a co-sponsor. His office said he had "no official comment" on the flip-flop.

Rep. Phil English (R-Pa.) also pulled his name, saying in a statement to The Politico, "…although I sympathize with the Armenian claims for justice, the timing of this resolution is unfortunate, given everything in the Middle East and our need to maintain a close engagement with our friends in Turkey. As we continue to work together to promote peace in the Middle East and Iraq, nothing should come between U.S. engagement with Turkey."

Republicans also see the resolution as an opportunity to paint Democrats as novices in international diplomacy. "It's another irresponsible foreign policy flap on the part of the majority on the heels of their trip to Syria," said Florida Rep. Adam Putnam, the third-ranking member in the Republican caucus.

The Bush administration "does not use the word 'genocide' to describe these events," the U.S. Embassy said in a March 13, 2007, statement. The administration, it clarified, "has never denied the mass murders and forced exile of up to 1.5 million Armenians" -- it just doesn't call it genocide.

"Unfortunately, the administration, rather than viewing it as a moral issue, puts it into U.S.-Turkish relations," said Aram Hambarian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America.

Schiff agrees, contending that the administration's opposition is "not a principled position to take." Refusing to acknowledge a 90-year-old genocide undercuts U.S. moral authority to end the genocide currently going on in Darfur, he added.

Hambarian said that Turkey's threats are bluffs, noting that it trades briskly with European nations that have condemned the genocide. He added that when the U.S. has previously bucked Turkey by mentioning the genocide, in several earlier House resolutions and a 1981 presidential proclamation by Ronald Reagan, the threats did not materialize.

"Every year the argument is made that this is not a good time," Schiff said. "It's been 90 years. If now is not the right time, when is?"

Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.