Experts say Urartians had no direct presence in northeastern Iran
2006/12/06
Mher News Agency
TEHRAN, Dec. 6 (MNA) -- A team of Iranian and Italian archaeologists which recently studied 27 ancient sites east of Lake Urmia said that despite the previous theory, the Urartians never had a direct presence in the region, the Persian service of CHN reported on Tuesday.
The team, led jointly by Iranian archaeologist Hamid Khatib-Shahidi and Italian archaeologist Rafael Bichone, began the surveys about three weeks ago to demarcate the boundaries of the Urartian state with Media and Mannai in the region.
Before the studies, many archaeologists regarded the region as the center of Urartu and consigned it to the map of the Uratian state.
“An appropriate environment, an abundance of water, and fertile land encouraged settlement and the establishment of local states in the region during the Iron Age,” Khatib-Shahidi said.
“It is certain that the Urartians had indirect relations with the people of the region. Sometimes they had clashes and sometimes allied (with each other). But the Urartians never had a direct presence or made fortifications in the Tabriz (region) and the Maragheh plains, i.e. north and south of Mt. Sahand,” he added.
The Iron Age castles near Mt. Sahand have mostly been built of stone without the use of mortar, he explained.
The ancient kingdom of Urartu, the biblical Ararat, flowered in the area south of the Caucasus from the ninth century to the seventh century BC.
Urartu, centered in the mountainous region around Lake Van, existed from about 1000 BC, or earlier, until 585 BC, and stretched from northern Mesopotamia through the southern Caucasus, including parts of present-day Armenia up to Lake Sevan.
“The local governments of the region (east of Lake Urmia) were tributary states of the Urartian state before the Medes came to power. The extant texts from the Assyrians, particularly Sargon II, refer to this fact,” Khatib-Shahidi noted.
The team has also identified remnants of some fortifications believed to date back to the Chalcolithic period (7000?-3500? BC).
“The inhabitants of the period built their castles on heights, but we have not yet been able to determine why they chose to settle on the heights rather than the plains,” Khatib-Shahidi said.
If it is proven that the remnants definitely belong to the Chalcolithic period, the fortifications will surely be among the oldest and last remaining very ancient defensive structures in the Middle East, he explained.
The team has also discovered shards dating back to the Achaemenid era.
Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.
Mher News Agency
TEHRAN, Dec. 6 (MNA) -- A team of Iranian and Italian archaeologists which recently studied 27 ancient sites east of Lake Urmia said that despite the previous theory, the Urartians never had a direct presence in the region, the Persian service of CHN reported on Tuesday.
The team, led jointly by Iranian archaeologist Hamid Khatib-Shahidi and Italian archaeologist Rafael Bichone, began the surveys about three weeks ago to demarcate the boundaries of the Urartian state with Media and Mannai in the region.
Before the studies, many archaeologists regarded the region as the center of Urartu and consigned it to the map of the Uratian state.
“An appropriate environment, an abundance of water, and fertile land encouraged settlement and the establishment of local states in the region during the Iron Age,” Khatib-Shahidi said.
“It is certain that the Urartians had indirect relations with the people of the region. Sometimes they had clashes and sometimes allied (with each other). But the Urartians never had a direct presence or made fortifications in the Tabriz (region) and the Maragheh plains, i.e. north and south of Mt. Sahand,” he added.
The Iron Age castles near Mt. Sahand have mostly been built of stone without the use of mortar, he explained.
The ancient kingdom of Urartu, the biblical Ararat, flowered in the area south of the Caucasus from the ninth century to the seventh century BC.
Urartu, centered in the mountainous region around Lake Van, existed from about 1000 BC, or earlier, until 585 BC, and stretched from northern Mesopotamia through the southern Caucasus, including parts of present-day Armenia up to Lake Sevan.
“The local governments of the region (east of Lake Urmia) were tributary states of the Urartian state before the Medes came to power. The extant texts from the Assyrians, particularly Sargon II, refer to this fact,” Khatib-Shahidi noted.
The team has also identified remnants of some fortifications believed to date back to the Chalcolithic period (7000?-3500? BC).
“The inhabitants of the period built their castles on heights, but we have not yet been able to determine why they chose to settle on the heights rather than the plains,” Khatib-Shahidi said.
If it is proven that the remnants definitely belong to the Chalcolithic period, the fortifications will surely be among the oldest and last remaining very ancient defensive structures in the Middle East, he explained.
The team has also discovered shards dating back to the Achaemenid era.
Note: Above are excerpts from the article. The full article appears here. Clarifications and comments by me are contained in {}. Deletions are marked by [...]. The bold emphasis is mine.
Labels: Urartu
posted by Vahe Balabanian at 5:53 PM
1 Comments:
That article doesn't make much sense to me. Actually it's fraught with errors and I think it's a load of crapola.
They say northeastern Iran: geographically NE is E of the Caspian, as in the city of Mashhad.
If that's what they meant, there was never a theory that Urartu was centered around the NE.
But since they mention Tabriz and Urmia they must be talking about northwestern Iran, SE Ararat.
To say there was no direct Urartian presence there is a falsity, certainly they were never centered around there, because quite frankly it's not a strategiclly clever spot, but they most certainly had direct influence... From the very same news agency this article
Map of Iran
Map of Urartu
Post a Comment
<< Home